Skip to main content

Conclusion

The Document as a Starting Point​

The purpose of this document is not to create an eternal and immutable system, but to define the initial parameters of a decision-making system. It is a starting point, a foundation from which the journey begins.

All the mechanisms described in this document — continuous voting, the electoral point system, delegation, competency weights, blockchain infrastructure — represent the initial configuration. Each of these parameters can and should be reconsidered, refined, or completely reworked by those who will use this system.

A Self-Modifying System​

A fundamental property of the proposed system is that it is capable of changing its own rules through the very same mechanism of continuous voting and decision-making that it defines.

For example:

  • GPG keys are chosen as the initial cryptographic technology, but if a more reliable or convenient alternative emerges in the future, citizens can vote to transition to a new standard
  • Electoral point thresholds (3,700 for president, 1,850 for laws) are initial values that can be adjusted as practical experience accumulates
  • Restrictions on competency point distribution (only within one's own or adjacent fields) can be reconsidered if practice shows the need for a different approach
  • Delegation rules (one level, one delegate) can be expanded or tightened based on real-world usage experience
  • The base amplification factor for competency weights is subject to tuning as its impact on voting outcomes becomes better understood

Non-Revolutionary Change in Action​

This self-modifiability is the very essence of the non-revolutionary approach:

The system does not need a revolution to update itself, because updating is built into the system itself.

Traditional political systems require constitutional crises, revolutions, or years-long bureaucratic procedures to change their fundamental rules. The proposed system is designed so that any rule can be changed — smoothly, peacefully, and through the will of the citizens.

At the same time, the inertia mechanism ensures that changes do not happen hastily: revising the system's fundamental rules requires sustained and prolonged expression of will, protecting against impulsive or destructive changes.

What Remains Unchanged​

The only thing that cannot be changed through voting is the principle itself that citizens make decisions through continuous voting. This is an axiom of the system. Abolishing voting through voting is a logical contradiction. Everything else — parameters, mechanisms, technologies, thresholds — is open for reconsideration.

Invitation to Participate​

This document is not a dogma, but an invitation to dialogue. We have described the concept, justified its necessity, and proposed specific mechanisms. Now it is up to those who are ready to discuss, critique, improve, and — ultimately — implement this system.

Because the best democracy is one created by the citizens themselves.

Back: Conflict Resolution ←